Skip to main content

Technodiversity glossary is a result of the ERASMUS+ project No. 2021-1-DE01-KA220-HED-000032038. 

The glossary is linked with the project results of Technodiversity. It has been developed by

Jörn Erler, TU Dresden, Germany (project leader); Clara Bade, TU Dresden, Germany; Mariusz Bembenek, PULS Poznan, Poland; Stelian Alexandru Borz, UNITV Brasov, Romania; Andreja Duka, UNIZG Zagreb, Croatia; Ola Lindroos, SLU Umeå, Sweden; Mikael Lundbäck, SLU Umeå, Sweden; Natascia Magagnotti, CNR Florence, Italy; Piotr Mederski, PULS Poznan, Poland; Nathalie Mionetto, FCBA Champs sur Marne, France; Marco Simonetti, CNR Rome, Italy; Raffaele Spinelli, CNR Florence, Italy; Karl Stampfer, BOKU Vienna, Austria.

The project-time was from November 2021 until March 2024. 



Browse the glossary using this index

Special | A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z | ALL

Page: (Previous)   1  ...  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  (Next)
  ALL

S

SP-13-23 mechanized pre-skidding of short logs

When trees are cross-cut at the felling site, the logs must be pre-skidded to the trail separately. This is only rational when the weight of the tree length is too high. For example, the basic log can be separated from the rest of the stem before pre-skidding.     

Functiogram:


 

Advantages
  • low weights, lower damage in the stand
Limitations, thresholds
Main use
  • Small scale forestry
  • simple, light machines

Economic suitability:

Minutes per cycle

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 60,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 2
  • in total: 130,00 Euro/h
  • regression line time per tree
    • b0 = 4,0
    • b1 (log volume) =  2,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,1


Ecological suitability

Ecograms 




Social suitability:

  • S-class: no contact with forest road -> S5
  • E-class: simple machine work, heavy and dangerous -> E3

Tags:

SP-21-22 delimbing

see SP-x1-x2 delimbing


SP-21-23 mechanized processing on the trail

Processor (or harvester) standing on skid road processing the full tree that is laying down in reach of feeding device. The processing includes measuring, forecasting dimension, suggesting assortments, delimbing and cross-cutting. 

Functiogram



Advantages
  • High productivity, low price (if fully utilized)
  • Low danger, low ergonomic injuries
Limitations, thresholds
  • Good for coniferous trees with straight stems
  • Limited with bigger, crooked or broadleaves trees
Main use
  • On accessible skidroads
  • Coniferous trees, younger broadleaves trees
  • Distance of skid roads > 2x reach of crane


Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 160,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 1
  • in total: 195,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 0,5
    • b1 (tree volume) = 2,0


Ecological suitability

Ecograms 




Social suitability

  • S-class: no contact with forest road -> S5
  • E-class: automatic machine work, moderate -> E5

Tags:

SP-21-31 mechanized skidding of full tree with grapple skidder

Full trees are dragged to the roadside landing by a machine that uses a grapple to collect the trees.

Functiogram



Advantages
  • very fast loading and unloading
  • no need to have an assistant to hook the loads
  • no need for the operator to leave the cab
  • by chains also possible on softer soils
Limitations, thresholds
  • trees need to be pre-bunched for the system to be efficient
  • smaller payload than for a clambunk or a forwarder
  • high speed and many repetitive cycles are heavy on the operator
Main use
  • plantation forestry (grapple-skidders on pre-bunched trees)


Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 80,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 1
  • in total: 115,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 2,5
    • b1 (tree volume) = 1,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,01 


Ecological suitability

Ecograms


Social suitability:


Tags:

SP-21-31 mechanized skidding of full trees with skidder

Full trees are dragged to the roadside landing by a tractor (dedicated skidder, crawler, forestry fitted farm tractor) using chains or cable.


Functiogram:



Advantages
  • It does not require to process the trees in the forest
  • simple machine and procedure
  • it can drag long loads
  • high speed
Limitations, thresholds
  • It requires large landings or a separate loader
  • needs skid trail in dense stands and or on steep terrain
  • relatively small payload
  • high speed and many repetitive cycles are heavy on the operator
  • aggressive on the soil (esp. crawlers in steep terrain)
  • operator needs to leave the cab and re-enter the cab twice per cycle, unless an assistant is available to do so (uncomfortable)

Main use
  • mountain operations
  • when we are not able to run a harvester-forwarder system and want to mechanize at roadside by processor (or chipper)


Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 40,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 2
  • in total: 110,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 5
    • b1 (tree volume) = 1
    • B2 (skidding distance) = 0,01


Ecological suitability

Ecograms



Social suitability:

  • S-class: unloading full trees on the road -> S3
  • E-class: simple machine work, heavy and dangerous -> E3
Literature:

graph from Ecotrac study and Rien's lesson (re-conduce  everything to tree size m3 on the x-axis, then different lines for different distances and maybe one graph for small skidder and one for large skidder)


Tags:

SP-21-31 skidding of full tree with clam-bunk skidder

Full trees are skidded with their butts resting on the rear axle of the skidder, while tree tops drag on the ground. The butts are retained on top of the rear axle by an inverted grapple (clambunk) and placed on that grapple using a hydraulic loader.

Functiogram


Advantages
  • Much reduced friction, soil disturbance and contamination
  • larger loads can be assembled, than it would be possible with a cable or grapple skidder
Limitations, thresholds
  • Large machine, very heavy and expensive
  • limited maneuverability, clumsy
Main use
  • Plantation forestry
  • Boreal forests on solid ground
  • Whenever long assortments need to be produced, and logs cannot be cut short (conversion kits for forwarders and skidder available)
  • Costs per m3 depending on tree volume


Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 90,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 1
  • in total: 125,00 Euro/h
  • regression line time per tree
    • b0 = 0,0
    • b1 (load volume) = 2,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,01


Ecological suitability

Ecograms




Social suitability:



Tags:

SP-21-34 mechanized chipping of full trees on the trail

Full trees that are laid down alongside the trail are chipped by a self-propelled chipper or a tractor powered chipper with terrain capability. Chips are blown into an integral bin and then transferred to a chip shuttle (forwarder-based) or into a bin trailer, towed by the same tractor or by an accompanying tractor.

Functiogram


 

Advantages
  • Trees are compacted into chips as early as possible to accrue all advantages of bulk density reduction and "fluidization"
  • Minimum tree handling
  • Minimum contamination
Limitations, thresholds
  • Needs suitable terrain conditions
  • Expansive machinery
  • Potential for interaction delays in the chipper-shuttle interface
  • Temptation to use the integral bin as a chip-forwarder (only on a very short distances)
Main use
  • Danish forestry – thinning there is very effective


Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 120,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 2
  • in total: 190,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 0,2
    • b1 (tree volume) = 2,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,03



Ecological suitability

Ecograms



Social suitability:


Literature:

Check Waterford studies


Tags:

SP-22-23 cross-cutting

see SP-x2-x3 cross-cutting


SP-22-32 mechanized skidding of tree lengths with clam-bunk skidder

Tree lengths that are pre-skidded to the trail are skidded to the forest road using a clam-bunk skidder. This includes: loading the trees with the crane into the clam-bunk, skidding them to forest road, storing them alongside road or a landing.

Functiogram



Advantages
  • compared with full trees you can build bigger loads (about 30%)
  • compared with skidder, the driver can remain in the cabin
  • high productivity    
Limitations, thresholds
  • Large machine, very heavy and expensive
  • limited maneuverability, clumsy
Main use

  • Traditional extraction method when crosscutting should not be done before reaching the forest road (or the customer)
  • high extraction volume like clear-cuts or wind-throws

Economic suitability

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 90,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 1
  • in total: 125,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 0,5
    • b1 (tree volume) = 2,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,01


Ecological suitability

Ecograms




Social suitability

Literature:

Logging arch study for farm tractors - Merlo study etc.


Tags:

SP-22-32 mechanized skidding of tree lengths with skidder

Tree lengths that are pre-skidded to the trail are skidded to the forest road. This includes: setting chokers on several tree-lengths to optimize the load, skidding them to forest road, storing them alongside road or a landing.


Functiogram



Advantages
  • High productivity because of high mass/load
  • Versatile machine, esp. if farm-tractor based (farm work, snow work, transportation etc.)
  • Relatively cheap machine
  • Independent relocation if road-legal
Limitations, thresholds
  • Damages in remaining stand at curves
  • Damage to ground (rutting)
  • Damage and dirt on logs
Main use
  • Extraction method when crosscutting should not be done before reaching the forest road (or the customer)
  • Very common method in broadleaved trees


Economic suitability

Minutes per cycle

Example:

  • machine costs without personal costs: 40,00 Euro/h
  • personal costs per person: 35,00 Euro/h
  • number of persons: 2
  • in total: 110,00 Euro/h
  • regression line minutes per tree
    • b0 = 3,0
    • b1 (tree volume) = 1,0
    • b2 (skidding distance) = 0,01


Ecological suitability

Ecograms 



Social suitability

  • S-class: unloading tree length on the road -> S3
  • E-class: simple machine work, heavy and dangerous -> E3



Page: (Previous)   1  ...  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  (Next)
  ALL


loader image