Skip to main content

Recreation

One aspect of societal compatibility is the potential to get in conflict with people who seek recreation in the forests. This group of forest users is not homogenous and so their demands are diverse, too. This makes it difficult to fully meet their needs.

Some studies have tried to describe this population of forest users. As an example, we can quote the research work of Kleinhückelkotten, who correlated forest visitor’s characteristics with SINUS-milieus that are widely used in socio-economics. SINUS-milieus try to categorize people  based on the intersection of social class (defined by income as lower or upper class) and the main orientation like  traditional values, believe in modernization or reorientation and experimentation as shown in the figure.

Though these results are only representative for Germany at beginning of this century and cannot be transferred to other countries without adaptations, the basic information seems to be relevant in general. The groups are:

·      22% holistic forest friends

·      16% ecological forest romantics

·      23% pragmatical distant persons

·      22% self-centered forest users

·      18% indifferent persons.

But all forest visitors have one common need: they use the forest roads as their access to the forest and don’t want to be disturbed. consequently, if we keep the roads clear for people to move on them, this can help to improve the acceptance of forest techniques and operations. In Technodiversity, we have invented the S-class that describes the grade of disturbance on the forest road by harvesting operations.

(See more under TDiv PR1-E02)



Lit.: Kleinhückelkotten S., Calmbach M., Glahe H.-P., Stöcker R., Wippermann C. & Wippermann K. 2009: Kommunikation für eine nachhaltige Waldwirtschaft. Forschungsverband Mensch & Wald, M&W –Bericht 09/01, Hannover, S. 33 ff

» Technodiversity Glossary

Tags:
loader image