The three-step-model
of decision-making in forest operations divides the decision-making process
into three logical sub-steps:
· The first step looks for those technical
methods that can be able to do the job that is demanded under the given
conditions. These methods are mostly defined by the machines, but the decision-maker
should be sure that the operators are available, too, and that the necessary
infrastructure for support, repairs etc. is there. It can be recommended to
look for 3 to 5 options that are as different as possible concerning different
machines, different degrees of mechanization… In addition, one more option
should be regarded at every decision-making process: the zero-option, say to do
nothing and not to fulfil the demanded job at all. This first step is called
the functionalization.
· The second step makes the assessment
of all options at the background of the given environment and conditions. We
call it localization. The criteria are the economic suitability for the
company (effectiveness and efficiency), the ecological
suitability for the local environment (ecological compatibility and eco-efficiency),
and the social suitability for the local population (societal compatibility
and ergonomics). If any option fails under one criterion due to official
rules or laws, it must be separated from the further decision-making process.
· The third step asks for the best option.
Since all remaining options follow the rules and laws, the decision-maker is
free to select that option that fulfils his individual priorities or preferences
in the best way. This selection can be done emotionally without a transparent
procedure, so we call this third step individualizing. But there are
some decision-making rules that make the way to find the final decision more
transparent and reliable.
