After
felling, trees are pre-skidded to a strip road using animals, and most commonly draught horses.
Different breeds are available in different regions, but the most popular are heavy breeds like French Percherons, Belgian Ardennes, or Italian TPR.
Capacity to work in dense stands and narrow corridors, inaccessible to mechanical vehicles.
Capacity to handle soft or steep terrain (provided extraction proceeds downhill).
Very low soil and stand impacts, because the animal has neither the size nor the power of a machine, and therefore it can never resort to brute force against an obstacle, but it must rather use brains and technique.
Safety for the operator, who can control the horse at a distance through voice commands.
Comfort for the operator, who is spared noise, vibration, exhaust gases, heavy cable pulls and tiresome walks on uphill grades (since he can ride the horse if the walk is too hard).
Competitive cost on intermediate pulls (between 50 and 100 m), which are too long for direct winching and too short for cost-effective cable yarding.
Limitations, thresholds
The system is suitable for young
trees only, as obtained from first and second thinnings, or to coppice harvesting
operations. The size of older trees is generally too large for an animal to
move them without preliminary delimbing and crosscutting
Distance must not exceed 200 m. Best
results are obtained on shorter distances, between 25 and 100 m.
Extraction must proceed on flat
terrain or downhill slopes, with a maximum gradient of 50%. Experienced animals
and drivers can safely handle steep terrain.
Draught animals can only work 5 to 6
hours a day. Operators working longer
hours generally keep two animals and rotate them.
Main use
Animal pre-skidding is still
competitive with other mechanized pre-skidding systems (winches, mini-skidders
etc.), but it is rarely used in industrialized countries, where it remains a
specialist niche. The reason is in the small numbers of horse loggers, ready to
accept the constant commitment imposed by animal care.
E-class: very heavy and dangerous manual work -> E1
Literature:
Baigent C. 1984. Clydesdale logging. LIRO Technical
Release 6, 4 pp.
De Paul
M., Bailly M. 2005. À propos de la pression exercée par les pneus, chenilles et
sabots. Forêt Wallonne 78: 21-33.
De Paul M.,
Lombaerde F., Jourez B. 2006. Approche économique du cheval en forêt. Forêt
Wallonne 81: 15-25.
Harstela P., Tervo L. 1981 Bunching of timber by
winches and horse. Folia Forestalia 466, 20 pp. In Finnish.
Hedman L. 1987.
Tools and equipment for horse logging. Small Scale For 1: 10-17.
Hedman L. 1988.
Skidding with horse to strip road. Small Scale For 2: 15-19.
Leinert S. 1979 Einsatz veraltungseingener
pferde beim vorrücken von schwachholz. Forsttechnische Informationen 1: 4-6.
Magagnotti N., Spinelli R. 2011 Integrating
animal and mechanical operations in protected areas. Croatian Journal of Forest
Engineering 32: 489-499.
Magagnotti N., Spinelli R. 2011 Financial
and energy cost of low-impact wood extraction in environmentally sensitive
areas. Ecological Engineering 37: 601-606.
McNamara D, Kaufman J. 1985. Can horses
compete with tractors? State of California, For. Dept., Sacramento, CA. For.
Note 95, 7 p.
Pynn L.
1991. Logging with horse power. Can Geogr 3: 31-35.
Shresta
S, Rummer R, Dubois M. 2005 Utilization and cost of log production from animal
logging operations. Int J For Eng 16: 167-180
Shresta
S, Lanford B., Rummer R, Dubois M. 2008 Soil disturbances from horse/mule logging operations
coupled with machines in the Southern United States. Int J For Eng 19: 17-23
Schroll E. (Editor) 2008 Holzrücken mit
pferden – Handbuch für die waldarbeit mit pferden. Starke Pferde Verlag, Lemgo,
Germany. In German.
Snoeck B. 2000.
Ces chevaux « qui traînent au bois ».
Forêt Wallonne 46: 12-23.
Thérer Y. 2006.
Situation du débardage au cheval en Région Wallonne, enquête auprès de
débardeurs. Forêt Wallonne 82: 18-27.
Toms C.,
Dubois M., Bliss J., Wilhoit J., Rummer B. 2001 A survey of animal-powered
logging in Alabama. South J Appl For 25: 17-24